Posted Saturday, September 28, 2002

Quick navigation

Alphabetical index (text)   

Newsletter of London Socialist Historians

London, Issue 16: Autumn 2002

[images added by this website]

 Evans at home

Professor Richard Evans: "Arrogant?"

London Socialist Historians Group

R. J. Evans, Telling Lies about Hitler: The Holocaust, History and the David Irving Trial, (Verso, 2002)

David Renton

RICHARD Evans was an expert witness for the defence in the libel action brought by David Irving against Deborah Lipstadt. In her book, Denying the Holocaust (Penguin, 1994), Lipstadt had named Irving as a Holocaust denier. Irving sued, and took the action to the High Court.

In April 2000, the judge ruled against the action, branding Irving a Holocaust denier and a falsifier of history. Richard Evans' book, Telling Lies about Hitler, is made up of two sections. The middle is a condensed version of Evans' 740-page witness report.

David Irving comments:

SMALL wonder that Evans earns an uncritical review from his fellow Socialist historians. Far from being the politically neutral expert that the courts require, he admitted under cross-examination (Day 18): "I am a member of the Labour party and, broadly speaking, I take the Labour Party's point of view on current affairs . . . I would not describe myself as an expert."

FOR the ludicrous debate in Court on the misreading of Heinrich Himmler's handwritten note of Dec 1, 1941, read and enjoy the Trial Transcript of Days 1, 3, 22, and 23.
   In the 1960s I was the first historian to take the trouble to decipher Himmler's handwritten notes, and inevitably I made misreadings: the copy before me was faint, and in Gothic handwriting. It was very easy to misread the phrase haben zu bleiben as Juden zu bleiben, and in the 1960s I did. [See the note's right-hand column, third line up]
   The error was inconsequential; as I pointed out to the Court, if the whole sentence was removed from the 1977 edition of Hitler's War it did not affect the paragraph 's meaning one whit. I gave copies of all the facsimiles and my typed transcripts to the Institut für Zeitgeschichte in the 1960s, even before the book was published -- hardly the work of a deliberate falisifier. In later editions the misreading was corrected.

If this is the substance, then it must be placed in context, and the beginning and final chapters serve that role. The last chapters include an account of how Irving responded to the evidence in court. At first Irving denying everything, then he sought to filibuster, seizing on the most inconsequential points, while neglecting the main ones.

Ultimately, Irving was forced to accept the claim (which mattered most to Evans) that he had consistently lied, falsifying documents, in order to try and shield Adolf Hitler from responsibility for the Holocaust.

The examples of deceit which Evans gives include mistranslating the sentence "SS leaders must stay" to "the Jews must stay" (in a document [see panel on right] which did not mention the killings), or claiming that a "stop" order (placed on one train-load of Jews being sent from Berlin to Riga) proved that Hitler opposed all killings from the start.

Evans demonstrates that such deliberate mistakes are legion in Irving's work, serving always to legitimise the regime.

Some of the most angry pages of this book are those in which Evans criticises those journalists who were arrogant enough to interview Irving, and to think that they could knock him down -- without doing even the most basic research -- and therefore allowed this fraud to outwit them.

Similar criticisms are also applied to a number of right-wing historians, operating on the cusp of journalism and the historical profession, who made the same mistake, Conor Cruise O'Brien, Stuart Nicholson, John Erickson, Donald Cameron Watt, John Keegan.

All of them wrote as if Irving was "one of us" and Lipstadt was not. Throughout this book, Richard Evans adopts the patient, deliberate tone of a man with an overwhelming case who asks only for the time to be heard. It becomes clear from his account that the defeat of David Irving in court was also a victory.

It was a triumph for the accurate memory of the Holocaust, against people who wanted to use the action to throw doubt on one of the most important events in twentieth-century history. It was also a success for the standards of professionalism, accuracy and rigour in the historical field. This impressive book deserves the widest possible readership.




 Evans reviews Guttenplan book in Daily Telegraph (Mar 20, 2001), calls it "A controversial account of the Irving libel trial"
  Radical's Diary
 Sunday Telegraph: Irving's home is repossessed as libel debts mount
 Michael Burleigh writes: It is time for the David Irving libel case to be consigned to history
The Führer, The Jackal, The Professor and his Publishers

The above news item is reproduced without editing other than typographical

 Register your name and address to go on the Mailing List to receive

David Irving's ACTION REPORT

© Focal Point 2002 F Irving write to David Irving