David Irving

[Photo by Michael Hentz, for The New York Times]


Churchill's Ambition


Letter to the Editor of
The Sunday Telegraph

The Sunday Telegraph 
The Letters Editor
1 Canada Square
Canary Wharf,
London E14 5AR 

Quick navigation

Sunday, January 16, 2000


Dear Sirs

re: Letter for publication: Holocaust Libel Action

[In Andrew Roberts' leading article (today) you have no doubt inadvertently repeated almost verbatim as his opinion several of the libels complained of, and added several more of his own. Please therefore print the following reply in its entirety:]

Sir,-- Being the fellow who supplied to Andrew Roberts the Lord Halifax diaries which he used to write his own definitive biography, I found his sneering article on my current libel action meagre recompense indeed. Taking just one point -- his claim to have seen on my desk a framed autograph of Adolf Hitler. I have never had any such thing. He may have confused it with the framed photograph of Sir Winston Churchill which has hung for twenty years on my wall, with a signed dedication: "Your friendship is a great privilege to me." (I bought it). The first step for a scholar must surely be to learn the difference between those two men's signatures.

Yours sincerely

David Irving

This letter was published by The Sunday Telegraph on Sunday, January 23, 2000 together with a lying response (below) from their journalist Andrew Roberts (on which of course the newspaper gave Mr Irving no chance to comment):


Andrew Roberts replies:


DAVID Irving's memory is playing him false yet again. He did not supply me with Lord Halifax's diaries, which were and are publicly available along with the rest of the Halifax archive at the Borthwick Institute in York, where I worked on them.

For Mr Irving to have a signed photograph of Sir Winston on his wall is obviously a rather sick joke, considering his book "Churchill's War" portrays the great war leader as a murderous but cowardly alcoholic who was in the pay of the Jews.

As for sneering at Mr Irving, I suppose I must plead guilty. The term "revisionist historian" used to be one of which many of us were proud. Through his activities it has been besmirched.




See Mr Irving's comment in next panel below

For nearly forty years Mr Irving has kept a diary and telephone logs, and these reveal the following facts:

Andrew Roberts phoned me on May 12, 1989, and I invited him to lunch on May 16. He then borrowed from me the Halifax diaries and other books and papers. On May 31, from Cape Town, I phoned my London office; Roberts had left a message on the answering machine, wanting to return the Fritz Wiedemann papers and the memoirs of Frau Ribbentrop, but retain the microfilm of the diaries for a while; he invited me to lunch. On August 30 there is this entry: "9 a.m. Andrew Roberts, author, returning Halifax documents." He invited me to the launch party for his book The Holy Fox on April 9, 1990; sadly, it escaped my memory on the evening concerned and I did not attend. With fellow-biographer Michael Bloch he invited me to dinner at the Saville Club on June 12, 1991: the invitation arrived too late for me to go. On June 4, 1992 he phoned from The Sunday Telegraph, about Rudolf Hess papers which the Public Record Office were just releasing, and asking me for advice. Etc etc etc. On October 28, 1997 I noted, "Roberts is a not-bad historian." Need I say more?

Incidentally: The Times published this "Times Diary" item on January 21, 2000, based no doubt on what Roberts phoned in to them:

 DAVID IRVING, the eccentric historian, gave Andrew Roberts. his more thoughtful peer, a public dressing-down yesterday. Spying Roberts in the Royal Courts of Justice -- where Irving is fighting the claim of Deborah Lipstadt, the American academic, that he is a "Hitler partisan" -- Irving offered a few damning thoughts on an article Roberts wrote in last week's Sunday Telegraph. I'm writing a letter about your stinking article," screamed Irving, before he was interrupted by the clerk's "All rise". "Luckily the judge turned up," breathes a relieved Roberts. "Irving is an enormous bear of a man. He could hide a plate in one hand. He looks like a grizzly from behind. I will compose a reply."

Let this cautionary tale be a warning to other historians not to provide Mr Roberts with any help whatsoever.


© Focal Point David Irving 2000