The International Campaign for Real History

Posted Saturday, January 24, 2004

[] Index to the Traditional Enemies of Free Speech
[] Alphabetical index (text)
AR-Online

Quick navigation

 

click for origin

David Irving comments:

SO where does this leave US Secretary of State Colin Powell?
   Last March 2003 he told the United Nations Security Council, before the world's television cameras, that he had National Security Council (NSA) telephone intercepts of Iraqi officers congratulating each other on having hidden the WMD in time to fool the inspectors of Dr Hans Blix.
    He even projected images of the alleged "transcripts" on the screen in the UN chamber.
   Is Powell a fool -- no, he can't properly be called that, because he's Black -- or is he a liar?
   Either way, he has made himself part of a conspiracy to wage an unprovoked war of aggression -- defined as a war crime under international law -- and is responsible for the deaths of countless thousands of innocent Iraqi men, women, and children.

Powell

Times

London, January 24, 2004

Saddam's large WMD stockpiles did not exist, admits American who led hunt

From James Bone
in New York

THE American who led the hunt for Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction (WMD) for the past eight months resigned last night, saying he did not believe Saddam Hussein had possessed such an arsenal for a decade.

"I don't think they existed," said David Kay. "What everyone was talking about is stockpiles produced after the end of the last [1991] Gulf War and I don't think there was a large-scale production programme in the Nineties.

"I think there were stockpiles at the end of the first Gulf War and a combination of UN inspectors and unilateral Iraqi action got rid of them. I think the best evidence is that they did not resume large-scale production, and that's what we're really talking about, is large stockpiles, not the small."

BushDr Kay's comments will be deeply embarrassing for both President Bush and Tony Blair, who went to war last year to eliminate what they called the imminent threat posed by Saddam's alleged chemical, biological and nuclear weaponry. They are also bad timing for the Prime Minister, coming days before the publication of the Hutton report.

Robin Cook, the former Foreign Secretary, told The Times that Tony Blair must now admit he was wrong about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction.

Mr Cook said:

"I have never doubted that Tony Blair acted in good faith but he cannot now go on insisting he was right, Next week, in his response to the Hutton report, is a good opportunity to put the record straight and to recognise that mistakes were made."

BlairJust two days ago Dick Cheney, the US Vice-President, repeated his conviction that the weapons existed, telling a radio interviewer: "It's going to take some additional considerable period of time in order to look in all of the cubby holes and ammo dumps in Iraq, where you might expect to find something like that." But last night the Administration signalled a significant downgrading of the hunt when it appointed a replacement for Dr Kay who has said publicly that he does not believe any weapons of mass destruction will be found.

Charles Duelfer, a former top UN weapons inspector in Iraq and a frequent critic of Dr Kay's approach, said in a TV television interview this month: "The prospect of finding chemical weapons, biological weapons is close to nil at this point." He added that the CIA-led Iraq Survey Group (ISG) headed by Dr Kay had been "talking to a lot of Iraqi scientists - anyone who has known where they are, they've spoken to. They've had every incentive to show them where they are, and they have come up with nothing."

 

IN what would be a big climbdown, the Administration also appeared to be on the verge of bowing to Shia pressure by changing its plans for choosing a government to assume power in Iraq this summer.

The White House said it wanted the United Nations to send a team to Iraq to examine the feasibility of holding elections so soon. Under Washington's existing plans, power would be handed to a transitional government appointed by caususes on July 1, with proper elections next year.

Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the spiritual leader of Iraq's Shia majority, ordered a halt to recent street demonstrations in favour of elections to encourage the UN to send a team. "Direct elections are possible," said Ahmad Chalabi, a [Quisling] member of the US-appointed Iraqi Governing Council with very close ties to Washington.

Washington has been quietly reducing the size of the 1,400-strong ISG, and has reassigned dozens of linguists to the counter-insurgency effort. seeking inspiration

Dr Kay was viewed as a hawk who expected to find stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons in Iraq. In a report to Congress last October, he presented evidence of illicit weapons programmes in Iraq but said his team had found no actual weapons of mass destruction (WMD).

Right: seeking inspiration >>

 

...on this website, about David Kay's search

Sept 2003: Intelligence claims of huge Iraqi stockpiles were wrong, says report. The hunt for weapons of mass destruction yields - nothing
Sept 2003: Britain and US will back down over WMDs
AJC Oct 2003: Did Bush officials exaggerate and distort prewar evidence about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction? Or were they, like the rest of us, simply the victims of poor intelligence work by the CIA and other agencies?
Oct 2003: Washington Post Wrong Path to War | and our comment, by Stephen Sniegoski: More on War Liberalism
Stephen Sniegoski has this comment on the latest 'WMD Bluff Theory.'

The above item is reproduced without editing other than typographical

 Register your name and address to go on the Mailing List to receive

David Irving's ACTION REPORT

or to hear when and where he will next speak near you

© Focal Point 2004 F Irving write to David Irving