• The Anti-Zionist Conference scheduled for Sweden in November 1992, and the lies that the JTA and Lipstadt spread about it
• How certain people tried to suppress free speech in Atlanta USA when David Irving came, Nov 4, 1993 …
• … but Mr Irving got an immediate Court Order forcing the city courthouse to honour its hire agreement for its chamber
• Deborah Lipstadt’s . . . March 1995 [WEBSITE APOLOGY: The document which was posted here until March 19, 1998 has been removed at the instance of Deborah Lipstadt’s lawyers. It did not unfortunately then come into the public domain, as she did not enter the witness box.]
• David Irving answers some impertinent questions in 1996
• Richard Rampton’s Flying Circus tours North America, speaking on trial, Oct 2000
• Transcript of Radio Four broadcast on Lipstadt Trial. Nov 8, 2001
• Scott Smith asks who paid Deborah Lipstadt’s trial costs, and gets a very full answer

• David Irving’s Initial Letter before Action
• David Irving’s Statement of Claim issued on Sept. 5, 1996 with a Writ alleging Libel in the Lipstadt book
• Defence pleaded by Victoria Sharp, counsel for Deborah Lipstadt, on Apr. 18, 1997
  A virtually identical Defence had been settled by Ms Sharp in Mr Irving’s libel action against Guardian Newspapers Ltd and Gitta Sereny.
• David Irving’s Reply to this Defence, served on April 19, 1997; posted here with links to relevant documents on this site.
• Affidavit sworn by Mr Irving’s personal assistant on an episode at the Waterstone’s branch in Colchester, Essex (Waterstone’s staff were originally co-defendants)
• The foul contagion spreads: Lipstadt’s book is required reading at universities in USA
• May 5, 1998: Anthony Julius (of Lipstadt defence attorneys Mishcon de Reya) and Board of Deputies of British Jews pleads for funds to aid her defence
• Lipstadt’s attorney Anthony Julius applies on May 13, 1998 for the High Court to Reject David Irving’s Discovery List; Julius swears a lengthy affidavit in support of his application.
• Affidavit by Jonathan Mozzochi, chief of US Pacific-Coast “Coalition for Human Dignity”, an organisation of mob-spitters, supporting this application by Julius. . .
• . . . but precisely who is Mozzochi? and what is his CHD? | a police report on him | his Paranoid World | The anti-Christian agitator Mozzochi | stated to be in Las Vegas as dishwasher
• Second affidavit by Jonathan Mozzochi, Aug.27, 1998
• Readers comment on David Irving’s diary coverage of the libel action
• Legal correspondence: the next moves, September 1998
• Affidavit of Mrs M B, organiser of Oct. 1994 Oregon function, sworn Sep. 15, 1998
• David Irving wrote to Penguin Books on Sept 11, 1998, offering to release them from the action | Text of this modest offer to settle | Letters (2004) discussing the motives behind making this offer and the Part 36 offer, Oct 1999
• Oct 2, 1998. The High Court ordered the two defamatory Mozzochi affidavits taken off the file. The writer’s diary record
• Dec 15, 1998: High Court in London orders Deborah Lipstadt to verify her document-discovery on oath
• Rob Ross suggests ways to exploit the lawsuit against Lipstadt … and David Irving replies
• Statements are exchanged of witnesses of fact [WEBSITE APOLOGY: Some of the statements and documents which were posted here from Jan. 22-25, 1999 have been removed under a High Court Order obtained by Deborah Lipstadt’s lawyers on Jan 26, 1999 (see next item). They will be posted again when they come into the public domain.]
• Prof. Deborah Lipstadt’s application for an Injunction to suppress publication on this Website of her witnesses’ statements and their documents | David Irving’s affidavit of Jan 26, 1999 | Order made by Mr Justice Moses
• Request to Hitler’s adjutant Otto Günsche to testify against Lipstadt
• Set down for trial on Jan 12, 2000

• Apr 16, 1999: Mr Irving issues summons against Lipstadt alleging concealment of Video Evidence | Mr Irving’s affidavit supporting the summons
• Apr 19, 1999: Mishcon claim privilege in the videos. Mr Irving disputes the privilege
• Apr 20, 1999: Response by Lipstadt’s lawyer Mishcon again (falsely) claiming privilege | and similar Affidavit served by them Apr 21, 1999, 7:50 p.m.
• Apr 23, 1999: Mr Irving’s Skeleton Legal Argument for the hearing
• Radical’s Diary: High Court hearing of Apr 23, 1999
• Apr 23, 1999: Mishcon undertake to bring the videos to the High Court hearing; since they break this undertaking Mr Irving reports them to the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors
• It turns out that Mishcon have broken undertakings to others
• Mishcon ask to see a May 1959 satirical university magazine edited by Mr Irving
• David Irving invites historian John Keegan to testify as an expert at the trial
• Since Dr Keegan refuses to testify voluntarily, Mr Irving puts him on notice that he will issue a subpoena
• Identities of Lipstadt’s four courtroom history experts revealed, statements served
• Mr Irving invites Professor R Evans to answer some queries about his expert report
• Niall McNamara Lodges a Formal Complaint with the Charities Commission about the Wiener Library Ltd withholding documents from Mr Irving during the Lipstadt trial
• 2004: Times mentions the Lipstadt Trial in an attack on the fees paid to “expert witnesses”

 Our dossier: The fight over Mr Irving’s seized possessions and archives

 Index to the interesting Legal Situation caused by Deborah Lipstadt’s illegal postings of Mr Irving’s privileged documents on her university website

• HOLOCAUST DENIAL LITERATURE: A BIBLIOGRAPHY, by John A. Drobnicki. Carol R. Goldman, Trina R. Knight, Johanna V. Thomas, 1994 (reproduced by permission of the Nizkor Site).
• The Courses which Prof. Lipstadt teaches at Emory University, Atlanta
• Chicago professor’s new book on Americans and the Holocaust heaps criticism on Deborah Lipstadt: Making “shoah-business” argument, he cites Lipstadt as example of the santification of the Holocaust
• Deborah Lipstadt replies to Peter Novick: The holocaust in the Western mind: how Americans think the unthinkable
• Deborah Lipstadt on Wolfgang Benz: vaguely uneasy that a German Historian should examine the Holocaust
• Worried report by Jerusalem Post, Sept 24, 1999, about this libel action
• Steve Pollack: “Emory’s Deborah Lipstadt prepares to do battle with Holocaust Denier David Irving“, Atlanta Jewish Times, Oct 8, 1999
• The Campaign for Democratic Renewal [one of Deborah Lipstadt’s defence witnesses], summarised in Who’s Who in Terrorism
• Judge rejects as “tainted” [Lipstadt witness] Bernie Farber in Toronto hate trial
• Anton Baer comments on Internet that Prof. Lipstadt’s refusal to debate with Deniers lays her open to wondering if she is not the “Flat-Earther”
• Newsday, Long Island, reports on coming “trial of the century”
• Law Student John Scholes asks questions, Thursday, July 28, 2005, about the Lipstadt Trial and appeal, and gets answers, but is not satisfied

Expert Reports [ some need Adobe Acrobat Reader: get it free!]

• Prof. Peter Longerich: 1. “Hitler’s Role in the Perscution of the Jews by the Nazi regime”. 2. “The Systematic Character of the National Socialist Policy for the Extermination of the Jews”
• Professor K MacDonald on the tactics of Judaism
• Hajo Funke: David Irving, Holocaust Denial, And His Connections To Right-Wing Extremists
• Prof. Christopher Browning: Evidence for the Implementation of the Final Solution
• Prof Deborah Lipstadt’s witness statement
• The Van Pelt Report by Robert Jan Van Pelt
• Prof Richard Evans: David Irving, Hitler and Holocaust Denial by Richard J. Evans. Warning: The Evans report in particular is highly defamatory, and is reproducible only in connection with this litigation
• London Socialist Historians Group gives Professor Richard “Skunk” Evans a rave review | and see R L Cope: “Irving versus Lipstadt: a[n] historian’s view of the case,” in Kleio, No.33, 2001 (University of South Africa)
• Witness Statement Of Deborah E. Lipstadt
• Witness Statement of Dr John P Fox (for Mr Irving)
• Witness statement of Kevin Bays: he admits that Penguin’s insurers paid their costs in Lipstadt libel action

Deborah Lipstadt: “There is no debate. I refuse to lower myself to debating with the revisionists.”